The Academy of ExpertsThe Academy of Experts
Search this site 

Quick Links

Member Login:

User:

Password:


ExpertSearch

Registered Users:

Email address

Password



Membership Information

   

Upcoming Courses

Foundation Course

Date: 13/14 Sept
Venue: The Academy
Members:  £495
Non-Members: £650


Into Court

Date: 21 September
Venue: The Academy
Members:  £295
Non-Members: £395


Mediation Training

Next Course Starts
September 2010
Venue: The Academy
From:  £275/day


Courses

Expert Witness

Mediation

Hong Kong


 

Cases

The cases shown below are of relevance to Experts and Mediators and have been published in The Academy's Journal - The Expert and Dispute Resolver.

These are not meant to be a comprehensive list of cases but are a selection of those which are of particular interest.

Click on the case name for further information about each case.

 


 

Case

Expert Edition

City of London v Sancheti
[2008] EWCA Civ 1283

Vol 14 Iss 1

Stay of Arbitration proceedings



McKechnie Plastic Components v Mrs E Grant
UKEAT/0284/08/MMA

Vol 14 Iss 2

Is the decision of a Joint Expert final?



Stewart (a protected party by his Litigation Friend Christopher Ramwell) v Glaze
[2009] EWHC 704 (QB)

Vol 14 Iss 2

Accident Reconstruction Evidence



Health Service Executive v Eamon Keogh trading as Keogh Software
[2009] IEHC 5407 P (High Court, Ireland)

Vol 14 Iss 3

Expert Determination (Ireland)



Williams v Jervis
[2009] EWHC 1837 (QB)

Vol 14 Iss 3

Is the Conduct of an Expert relevant to costs?



Leo Sawrij Ltd v North Cumbria Magistrates’ Court
[2009] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

Vol 14 Iss 3

When is an expert not an expert?



In the matter of M (Children)
[2007] EWCA Civ 1363

Vol 13 Iss 1

Written Expert Evidence and its evidential weight



Novartis Grimsby Ltd v John Cookson
[2007] EWCA Civ 1261

Vol 13 Iss 1

Expert evidence - Judge preferring the evidence of one Expert to that of another



Thorp v Sharp
[2007] EWCA Civ 1433

Vol 13 Iss 1

The burden of proof and the remit of the Expert



Halifax Life Limited v The Equitable Life Assurance Society
[2007] EWHC 503

Vol 13 Iss 2

Expert Determination - the dangers of (inadequate) reasons



Shepherd & Neame v EDF Energy Networks (SPN) PLC
[2008] EWHC 123 (TCC)

Vol 13 Iss 2

Expert’s Report once disclosed can be used by others



Re: S (a child)
[2008] EWCA Civ 365

Vol 13 Iss 2

Expert should only see documentation relevant to issues



Homepace Limited v SITA South East Limited
[2008] EWCA Civ 1

Vol 13 Iss 2

Expert Determiners need to know what they are doing



(1) Cumbria Waste Management Limited and (2) Lakeland Waste Management Limited v Baines Wilson (a firm)
[2008] EWHC 786 (QB)

Vol 13 Iss 2

Disclosure, Without Prejudice, Confidentiality and Litigation



Saunder v Birmingham City Council
EAT 21/5/08

Vol 13 Iss 3

SJE - tests for allowing additional Experts



Esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance PLC [2008] EWCA Civ 842
[2008] EWCA Civ 842

Vol 13 Iss 3

Experts need knowledge Lawyers do not have



Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited v (1) Cleveland Bridge UK Limited and (2) Cleveland Bridge Dorman Long Engineering Limited
[2008] EWHC 2220 (TCC)

Vol 13 Iss 3

Lay Witness with expert knowledge



Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane SPA v Rotunno and Others
[2008] EWHC 185 (Ch)

Vol 13 Iss 3

Interpretation of documents is the judge’s job.



Kirkman v Euro Exide Corporation (CMP Batteries Ltd)
[2007] EWCA Civ 66

Vol 12 Iss 1

Relevance of Expert Evidence to Limitation



Aird and Aird v Prime Meridian Limited [2006]
EWHC 2338 (TCC)

Vol 12 Iss 1

The confused case of the meeting of experts and mediation



Andrew Carruthers v (1) Mp Fireworks Ltd (2) Balfour Convenience Stores Ltd (2007)
Bristol County Court (Recorder Moxon-Browne QC) 26th January 2007

Vol 12 Iss 1

Potential Conflicts of Interest



R (on the application of Singapore Medical Council) (Claimant) v General Medical Council (Defendant) & Simon Shorvon (Interested Party) (2006)
[2006] EWHC 3277 (Admin) QBD (Admin) (Davis J) 21/12/2006

Vol 12 Iss 1

Expert adviser investigation



Miah V Birmingham & The Black County Strategic Health Authority
[2007] EWCA Civ 290

Vol 12 Iss 2

Another case of misuse of statistics by an Expert



Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (Applicant) v (1) GW (2) PW (3) KPW (A Child by his Guardian Jacqueline Coultridge) (Respondents) & W ST C Forbes
[2007] EWHC 136 (Fam) Fam Div (Ryder J) 20/3/2007

Vol 12 Iss 2

Guidance for Experts in Family (and possibly other) Matters



British Nuclear Group Sellafield Ltd v Gemeinschaftskernkraftwerk Grohnde GmbH & Anor
[2007] EWHC 2245 (Ch) (19 October 2007)

Vol 12 Iss 3

The Employed Expert and how to Overcome a Lack of Independence



Mid-Devon District Council v Stevenson
[2007] UKEAT 0196 07 1810 (18 October 2007)

Vol 12 Iss 3

The discretion to allow further Expert Evidence to be obtained



LP v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2007] UKAIT 00076 (08 August 2007) (A decision of the United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal)

Vol 12 Iss 3

The Weight to be given to Expert Evidence – are you only as good as your last report?



Re M (Children) (Expert Evidence)
[2004] EWCA Civ 1311

Vol 11 Iss 1

Practical approach for Experts’ access



GW & PW v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and another
[2005] EWCA Civ 1247

Vol 11 Iss 1

Medical experts reference and the consumer need for 2nd Expert



In the Matter of A Company
[2005] Reported in Lawtel (a decision of Lewison J in the High Court, Chancery Division)

Vol 11 Iss 1

The fascinating case of a without prejudice threat



Vasiliou v Hajigeorgiou
[2005] EWCA Civ 236

Vol 11 Iss 1

The effect of not stipulating the expert by name



Petursson and Another v Hutchinson 3G
[2005] EWHC 920 (TCC)

Vol 11 Iss 1

Crusading expert lacked evidence



The Owners and Bareboat Charterers of the vessel “Global Mariner” v the Owners and Bareboat Charterers of the vessel “Atlantic Crusader”
[2005] EWCH 380 (Admlty)

Vol 11 Iss 1

Guidelines for Assessors



Armstrong & O’Connor v First York
[2005] EWCA Civ 277

Vol 11 Iss 1

Court can prefer eye witness evidence to the expert’s opinion



Breeze v Ahmad
[2005] EWCA Civ 233cÑ<§µ

Vol 11 Iss 1

Expert’s failure tp roduce backing literature causes re-trial



Great North Eastern Rlwy Ltd v JLT Corporate Risks Ltd
[2006] EWHC 1478Issue

Vol 11 Iss 2

Relevance of Expert Evidence to Limitation



Tufano v Vincenti
[2006] EWHC 1496 (QB)

Vol 11 Iss 2

Immunity from Suit applicable to Experts – Libel Proceedings



R v JH and TG (Deceased)
[2005] EWCA Crim 1828

Vol 11 Iss 2

Expert Evidence of Childhood Amnesia



R v Thomas Bowman
[2006] EWCA 417

Vol 11 Iss 2

Content of Experts’ Reports in Criminal Proceeding



Toth v Jarman
[2006] EWCA Civ 1028 (CA)

Vol 11 Iss 2

Potential Conflicts of Interest



Smiths Group Plc and Anor v Weiss and Ors
(2002) (Unreported)

Vol 9 Iss 1

The importance of the ‘without prejudice’ rule



Beck v Ministry of Defence
[2003] EWCA Civ 1043 (Court of Appeal)

Vol 9 Iss 1

Should an expert’s report be disclosed if he is replaced by another?



Royal Bank of Canada v Secretary of State for Defence
[2003] EWHC 1841 (Chancery Division)

Vol 9 Iss 1

Should a defendant be awarded all costs despite refusal to mediate?



Corenso (UK) Ltd v Burnden Group Plc
[2003] EWHC 1805 (Queen’s Bench Division)

Vol 9 Iss 1

Who should bear the costs?



Virani Ltd v Manuel Revert y CIA SA
[2003] EWCA Civ 1651 (Court of Appeal)

Vol 9 Iss 1

When the defendant refuses the offer of court mediation



P v P
[2003] EWHC 2260 (Family Division)

Vol 9 Iss 1

Divorce, financial impropriety and the NCIS



Marsh v WR Grace & Co.
2003 WL 22718177 (4th Cir. 11/19/03)

Vol 9 Iss 1

When an expert’s report cannot be relied upon



Cuffari v S-B Power Tool Co.
2003 WL 22520411 (3rd Cir. 11.7/03)

Vol 9 Iss 1

Failing the Daubert test



In re Rezulin
Decision of New York State District Court reported at 2004 WL 384897, decided 27 February 2004

Vol 9 Iss 1

Expert testimony based on subjective view rather than knowledge



Shirayama Shokusan v Danovo Ltd
[2003] EWHC 3006 (Chancery Division)

Vol 9 Iss 1

Does the court have jurisdiction to order mediation, even if one party is unwilling?



Parkinson v Guidant Corp
2004 WL 837858 (W.D. Pa. 3/22/2004)

Vol 9 Iss 2

An attempt to exclude expert testmonies



Stotts v Heckler & Koch
299 F. Supp. 2d. 814 (WD Tenn. 2004)

Vol 9 Iss 2

Unsupported statements of opinion by experts are simply not good enough



Deveron Joinery Company Ltd v Perkins
[2003] EWCA Civ 1241

Vol 9 Iss 2

Expert evidence dealt with unsatisfactorily



Smolen v Solon Co-operative Housing
[2003] EWCA Civ 1240

Vol 9 Iss 2

Expert witnesses should possess the three ‘I’s



Hesham Amin Hamza El Nasharty and others v J Sainsburys Plc
[2003] EWHC 2195

Vol 9 Iss 2

Parties who want breadth should be explicit



Secretary of State for the Home Department v AA
[2004] UKIAT

Vol 9 Iss 2

Expert evidence in the field of immigration



St Andrews Bay Development Ltd v HBG Management Ltd, Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland
Judgement 4 April 2003

Vol 8 Iss 2

Adjudication - when is a decision made - fees agreements need to be in advance of the event



Cour de Cassation, (Chambre Mixte), France.
Ruling No. 217, 14.02.2003

Vol 8 Iss 2

France recognises the validity of a contract clause to mediate



SPE International v (1) Professional Preparation Contractors (UK) Ltd and (2) John Glew
[2002] EWHC 881 (Ch)

Vol 8 Iss 2

The cost using a non-expert expert



Stephen Hill Partnership Ltd v Supaglazing and Anor
[2002] All ER D 229

Vol 8 Iss 2

A late change in experts upheld despite reason being inadequate. A lucky escape or a new judicial approach?



Leicester Circuits Ltd v Coates Brothers plc
[2003] EWCA Civ 333

Vol 8 Iss 2

Success in litigation does not stop ‘punishment’ of party withdrawing from mediation



Carpenter v Pembrokeshire County Council
[2002] EWHC 1968

Vol 8 Iss 2

Expert, pressured by client, forgets duty as an expert witness in favour of advocacy



ES (by her mother and best friend DS) v Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Royal Hospital NHS Trust
[2003] EWCA Civ 1284 (C.A)

Vol 8 Iss 3

The views of one expert may not be seen as representative of the views of his profession as a whole



Alan Valentine v (1) Kevin Allen (2) Simon Nash (3) Alison Nash
[2003] EWCA Civ 1274

Vol 8 Iss 3

Respondents to the claim were awarded costs, despite declining mediation



Norfolk Southern Corp. v Chevron USA Inc
No 3:00-cv-366-J-32MMH (M>D> Fla. 7 August 7 August 2003)

Vol 8 Iss 3

Experts ‘forced to fill too many blanks with speculation and conjecture’



Clausen v M/V New Carissa,
No 01-35928 (9th Circuit, 12 August 2003)

Vol 8 Iss 3

Novel and unresearched expert evidence



Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd v European Reinsurance Co of Zurich
[2003] UKPC 11

Vol 8 Iss 3

What happens and what is decided in arbitration is confidential



Coopers Payen Ltd and Sanwa Packing Industry Co. Ltd. v Southampton Container Terminal
[2003] EWCA Civ 1223 (CA)

Vol 8 Iss 3

Did the judge disregard the expert evidence in favour of an eye witness?



Lucas v Barking, Havering & Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust
[2003] EWCA Civ 1102

Vol 8 Iss 3

The disclosure of documents under the CPR




Site Map

Home | Cases | Expert Training Courses | Find an Expert | Find a Mediator | Home | Mediation | Mediation Training Courses | Membership | News | Resources | Copyright | Search

The Academy of Experts - 3 Gray's Inn Square, London, WC1R 5AH
Tel: +44 (0)20 7430 0333 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7430 0666 - email: admin@academy-experts.org

 

DHTML Menu/JavaScript Menu by OpenCube