Case | Expert Edition |
City of London v Sancheti [2008] EWCA Civ 1283 | Vol 14 Iss 1 |
Stay of Arbitration proceedings
|
McKechnie Plastic Components v Mrs E Grant UKEAT/0284/08/MMA | Vol 14 Iss 2 |
Is the decision of a Joint Expert final?
|
Stewart (a protected party by his Litigation Friend Christopher Ramwell) v Glaze [2009] EWHC 704 (QB) | Vol 14 Iss 2 |
Accident Reconstruction Evidence
|
Health Service Executive v Eamon Keogh trading as Keogh Software [2009] IEHC 5407 P (High Court, Ireland) | Vol 14 Iss 3 |
Expert Determination (Ireland)
|
Williams v Jervis [2009] EWHC 1837 (QB) | Vol 14 Iss 3 |
Is the Conduct of an Expert relevant to costs?
|
Leo Sawrij Ltd v North Cumbria Magistrates’ Court [2009] EWHC 2823 (Admin) | Vol 14 Iss 3 |
When is an expert not an expert?
|
In the matter of M (Children) [2007] EWCA Civ 1363 | Vol 13 Iss 1 |
Written Expert Evidence and its evidential weight
|
Novartis Grimsby Ltd v John Cookson [2007] EWCA Civ 1261 | Vol 13 Iss 1 |
Expert evidence - Judge preferring the evidence of one Expert to that of another
|
Thorp v Sharp [2007] EWCA Civ 1433 | Vol 13 Iss 1 |
The burden of proof and the remit of the Expert
|
Halifax Life Limited v The Equitable Life Assurance Society [2007] EWHC 503 | Vol 13 Iss 2 |
Expert Determination - the dangers of (inadequate) reasons
|
Shepherd & Neame v EDF Energy Networks (SPN) PLC [2008] EWHC 123 (TCC) | Vol 13 Iss 2 |
Expert’s Report once disclosed can be used by others
|
Re: S (a child) [2008] EWCA Civ 365 | Vol 13 Iss 2 |
Expert should only see documentation relevant to issues
|
Homepace Limited v SITA South East Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 1 | Vol 13 Iss 2 |
Expert Determiners need to know what they are doing
|
(1) Cumbria Waste Management Limited and (2) Lakeland Waste Management Limited v Baines Wilson (a firm) [2008] EWHC 786 (QB) | Vol 13 Iss 2 |
Disclosure, Without Prejudice, Confidentiality and Litigation
|
Saunder v Birmingham City Council EAT 21/5/08 | Vol 13 Iss 3 |
SJE - tests for allowing additional Experts
|
Esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance PLC [2008] EWCA Civ 842 [2008] EWCA Civ 842 | Vol 13 Iss 3 |
Experts need knowledge Lawyers do not have
|
Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited v (1) Cleveland Bridge UK Limited and (2) Cleveland Bridge Dorman Long Engineering Limited [2008] EWHC 2220 (TCC) | Vol 13 Iss 3 |
Lay Witness with expert knowledge
|
Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane SPA v Rotunno and Others [2008] EWHC 185 (Ch) | Vol 13 Iss 3 |
Interpretation of documents is the judge’s job.
|
Kirkman v Euro Exide Corporation (CMP Batteries Ltd) [2007] EWCA Civ 66 | Vol 12 Iss 1 |
Relevance of Expert Evidence to Limitation
|
Aird and Aird v Prime Meridian Limited [2006] EWHC 2338 (TCC) | Vol 12 Iss 1 |
The confused case of the meeting of experts and mediation
|
Andrew Carruthers v (1) Mp Fireworks Ltd (2) Balfour Convenience Stores Ltd (2007) Bristol County Court (Recorder Moxon-Browne QC) 26th January 2007 | Vol 12 Iss 1 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest
|
R (on the application of Singapore Medical Council) (Claimant) v General Medical Council (Defendant) & Simon Shorvon (Interested Party) (2006) [2006] EWHC 3277 (Admin) QBD (Admin) (Davis J) 21/12/2006 | Vol 12 Iss 1 |
Expert adviser investigation
|
Miah V Birmingham & The Black County Strategic Health Authority [2007] EWCA Civ 290 | Vol 12 Iss 2 |
Another case of misuse of statistics by an Expert
|
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (Applicant) v (1) GW (2) PW (3) KPW (A Child by his Guardian Jacqueline Coultridge) (Respondents) & W ST C Forbes [2007] EWHC 136 (Fam) Fam Div (Ryder J) 20/3/2007 | Vol 12 Iss 2 |
Guidance for Experts in Family (and possibly other) Matters
|
British Nuclear Group Sellafield Ltd v Gemeinschaftskernkraftwerk Grohnde GmbH & Anor [2007] EWHC 2245 (Ch) (19 October 2007) | Vol 12 Iss 3 |
The Employed Expert and how to Overcome a Lack of Independence
|
Mid-Devon District Council v Stevenson [2007] UKEAT 0196 07 1810 (18 October 2007) | Vol 12 Iss 3 |
The discretion to allow further Expert Evidence to be obtained
|
LP v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKAIT 00076 (08 August 2007)
(A decision of the United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal) | Vol 12 Iss 3 |
The Weight to be given to Expert Evidence – are you only as good as your last report?
|
Re M (Children) (Expert Evidence) [2004] EWCA Civ 1311 | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
Practical approach for Experts’ access
|
GW & PW v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and another [2005] EWCA Civ 1247 | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
Medical experts reference and the consumer need for 2nd Expert
|
In the Matter of A Company [2005] Reported in Lawtel (a decision of Lewison J in the High Court, Chancery Division) | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
The fascinating case of a without prejudice threat
|
Vasiliou v Hajigeorgiou [2005] EWCA Civ 236 | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
The effect of not stipulating the expert by name
|
Petursson and Another v Hutchinson 3G [2005] EWHC 920 (TCC) | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
Crusading expert lacked evidence
|
The Owners and Bareboat Charterers of the vessel “Global Mariner” v the Owners and Bareboat Charterers of the vessel “Atlantic Crusader” [2005] EWCH 380 (Admlty) | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
Guidelines for Assessors
|
Armstrong & O’Connor v First York [2005] EWCA Civ 277 | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
Court can prefer eye witness evidence to the expert’s opinion
|
Breeze v Ahmad [2005] EWCA Civ 233cÑ<§µ | Vol 11 Iss 1 |
Expert’s failure tp roduce backing literature causes re-trial
|
Great North Eastern Rlwy Ltd v JLT Corporate Risks Ltd [2006] EWHC 1478Issue | Vol 11 Iss 2 |
Relevance of Expert Evidence to Limitation
|
Tufano v Vincenti [2006] EWHC 1496 (QB) | Vol 11 Iss 2 |
Immunity from Suit applicable to Experts – Libel Proceedings
|
R v JH and TG (Deceased) [2005] EWCA Crim 1828 | Vol 11 Iss 2 |
Expert Evidence of Childhood Amnesia
|
R v Thomas Bowman [2006] EWCA 417 | Vol 11 Iss 2 |
Content of Experts’ Reports in Criminal Proceeding
|
Toth v Jarman [2006] EWCA Civ 1028 (CA) | Vol 11 Iss 2 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest
|
Smiths Group Plc and Anor v Weiss and Ors (2002) (Unreported) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
The importance of the ‘without prejudice’ rule
|
Beck v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWCA Civ 1043 (Court of Appeal) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Should an expert’s report be disclosed if he is replaced by another?
|
Royal Bank of Canada v Secretary of State for Defence [2003] EWHC 1841 (Chancery Division) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Should a defendant be awarded all costs despite refusal to mediate?
|
Corenso (UK) Ltd v Burnden Group Plc [2003] EWHC 1805 (Queen’s Bench Division) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Who should bear the costs?
|
Virani Ltd v Manuel Revert y CIA SA [2003] EWCA Civ 1651 (Court of Appeal) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
When the defendant refuses the offer of court mediation
|
P v P [2003] EWHC 2260 (Family Division) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Divorce, financial impropriety and the NCIS
|
Marsh v WR Grace & Co. 2003 WL 22718177 (4th Cir. 11/19/03) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
When an expert’s report cannot be relied upon
|
Cuffari v S-B Power Tool Co. 2003 WL 22520411 (3rd Cir. 11.7/03) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Failing the Daubert test
|
In re Rezulin Decision of New York State District Court reported at 2004 WL 384897, decided 27 February 2004 | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Expert testimony based on subjective view rather than knowledge
|
Shirayama Shokusan v Danovo Ltd [2003] EWHC 3006 (Chancery Division) | Vol 9 Iss 1 |
Does the court have jurisdiction to order mediation, even if one party is unwilling?
|
Parkinson v Guidant Corp 2004 WL 837858 (W.D. Pa. 3/22/2004) | Vol 9 Iss 2 |
An attempt to exclude expert testmonies
|
Stotts v Heckler & Koch 299 F. Supp. 2d. 814 (WD Tenn. 2004) | Vol 9 Iss 2 |
Unsupported statements of opinion by experts are simply not good enough
|
Deveron Joinery Company Ltd v Perkins [2003] EWCA Civ 1241 | Vol 9 Iss 2 |
Expert evidence dealt with unsatisfactorily
|
Smolen v Solon Co-operative Housing [2003] EWCA Civ 1240 | Vol 9 Iss 2 |
Expert witnesses should possess the three ‘I’s
|
Hesham Amin Hamza El Nasharty and others v J Sainsburys Plc [2003]
EWHC 2195 | Vol 9 Iss 2 |
Parties who want breadth should be explicit
|
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AA [2004] UKIAT | Vol 9 Iss 2 |
Expert evidence in the field of immigration
|
St Andrews Bay Development Ltd v HBG Management Ltd, Outer House, Court of Session, Scotland Judgement 4 April 2003 | Vol 8 Iss 2 |
Adjudication - when is a decision made - fees agreements need to be in advance of the event
|
Cour de Cassation, (Chambre Mixte), France. Ruling No. 217, 14.02.2003 | Vol 8 Iss 2 |
France recognises the validity of a contract clause to mediate
|
SPE International v (1) Professional Preparation Contractors (UK) Ltd
and (2) John Glew [2002] EWHC 881 (Ch) | Vol 8 Iss 2 |
The cost using a non-expert expert
|
Stephen Hill Partnership Ltd v Supaglazing and Anor [2002] All ER D 229 | Vol 8 Iss 2 |
A late change in experts upheld despite reason being inadequate. A lucky escape or a new judicial approach?
|
Leicester Circuits Ltd v Coates Brothers plc [2003] EWCA Civ 333 | Vol 8 Iss 2 |
Success in litigation does not stop ‘punishment’ of party withdrawing from mediation
|
Carpenter v Pembrokeshire County Council [2002] EWHC 1968 | Vol 8 Iss 2 |
Expert, pressured by client, forgets duty as an expert witness in favour of advocacy
|
ES (by her mother and best friend DS) v Chesterfield and
North Derbyshire Royal Hospital NHS Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 1284 (C.A) | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
The views of one expert may not be seen as representative of the views of his profession as a whole
|
Alan Valentine v (1) Kevin Allen (2) Simon Nash (3) Alison Nash [2003] EWCA Civ 1274 | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
Respondents to the claim were awarded costs, despite declining mediation
|
Norfolk Southern Corp. v Chevron USA Inc No 3:00-cv-366-J-32MMH (M>D> Fla. 7 August 7 August 2003) | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
Experts ‘forced to fill too many blanks with speculation and conjecture’
|
Clausen v M/V New Carissa, No 01-35928 (9th Circuit, 12 August 2003) | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
Novel and unresearched expert evidence
|
Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd v European Reinsurance
Co
of Zurich [2003] UKPC 11 | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
What happens and what is decided in arbitration is confidential
|
Coopers Payen Ltd and Sanwa Packing Industry Co. Ltd. v Southampton
Container Terminal [2003] EWCA Civ 1223 (CA) | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
Did the judge disregard the expert evidence in favour of an eye witness?
|
Lucas v Barking, Havering & Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 1102 | Vol 8 Iss 3 |
The disclosure of documents under the CPR
|